skip to main content
 
Click to print a copy of this page

OPTION 3: Phased deep geological disposal

(burying waste underground but keeping the store open)

Like option 2, Deep geological disposal, this option involves placing radioactive waste into engineered chambers deep underground in places where the geology can provide a secure barrier.

This option differs from Deep geological disposal in that the chambers are designed to be accessible and monitored for an interim period until they are finally closed and filled in at some future date.

The aim of this option is to wait until we are more certain that the facility will perform as we expect it to, before sealing off the waste.

Advantages

Disadvantages

If future generations decide to manage the waste differently, or if there are problems, they could retrieve the waste before the chambers are sealed off.

Burying the wastes underground may make this option more safe and secure, e.g. from terrorist attack, than Option 1, Long-term interim storage

Like Option 2, this option needs particular types of geology which only exist in certain places in the UK.

Excavating an underground chamber, keeping the facility open, and monitoring the waste would be very expensive.

This method relies on future generations being able to monitor and maintain the facility until they decide what to do.

In the short term, this option may not be as secure as sealing the waste off straight away.

 

  Click to go back to the previous screen Click to go on to the next screen

Customer support: webform / email | ©2000-2008 DB Education Services Ltd | about us | terms & conditions
DB requires modern browsers with JavaScript enabled. Some areas are enhanced with Macromedia Flash
v2.1 build.62 served by w006.dbplc.com